My attempt to locate online images like  in my SB instance ended up producing this ![[abcdefg.suffix]] along with [[abcdefg.suffix]] picker unintentionally.
My original goal was an online-image picker, but such images are not regarded as indexable objects.
This suggests we may convert these !()[abcdefg.suffix]s into objects, or perhaps objectify everything (extending the built-in tags list)? and may further require some real SQL support.
For now, one expedient method is to add a label/anchor (or any built-in tag) to/alongside each online image link !()[abcdefg.suffix] and rely on the Anchor/Label Picker to query them, though this solution feels inelegant despite its generality.
this
![[name.suffix]] Pickeris slightly different from the built-inDocument Picker…